Women staying unmarried is said to be on account of a shortage of men. I don't buy that theory. I will rather we say shortage of marriageable, eligible or loveable men, and perhaps a shortage of women capable of getting and keeping the type of men they want to be with. So, it is not a problem of ratio of men to women, it is a thing of compatibility, chemistry and perhaps preference.
Even if the sexes were neck and neck in ratio, if compatibility, chemistry or preference is not present, if ignorant bimbos don't want to be with their unintellectual equals, if ugly chicks cannot settle for less than what their extremely hot friends have, if men that are visually challenging to women don't want to be with a lady without full lips, round booty, and fine skin, some people will remain unmarried, because the options available to them will be found deficient in inspiring the love and affection they desire.
Since ours is a society with callous disregard for feelings, it is not uncommon for parents to force their daughters on big spenders and folks with lucrative careers. But it usually won't last because a couple of years down, the lady will have some jobless honey on the side screwing her. It's a simple law of attraction; this jobless loser has the power to excite her feelings and to gain her affection, because there's this force that pulls them together regardless of their own will, something money cannot buy. So instead of numbers, I am saying bachelorship and spinsterhood is as a result of a growing imbalance in mutual attraction.
No comments:
Post a Comment